end of the world Do we really want to end world hunger?
There are many BILLIONaires, also millionaires, with untold scads more $$$ than they will ever need.
Are people going hungry because there isn't enough food, or because there is TOO MUCH greed?
It seems there is plenty of money for people to have a decent life, or at least food to eat, but the rich are getting richer?
What do you all think?
I agree! But there are always those stupid rich people out there who have their 43 bedroom houses and 10 cars. Which is not necisarry at all.
I'd say that people who have that much money should be forced to donate $250 a month to the homeless
Watch The Way I Spent the End of the World Full Movie Online Part 1
What are three possible drawbacks of the terms in the agreement to end world war I?
The terms were draconian and made it very difficult for Germany to recover. It crippled her seriously sick economy.
There was no form of verification to make sure that Germany disarmed and followed the military conditions of the treaty. They never did either.
The victorious democracies did not offer the losers assistance to rebuild and made no effort to impose a constitution which guaranteed democracy and human rights nor did it make them part of the international community again..
the end of the world What can i do to help end world hunger? and how can i donate?or anything else that you know about world hunger
i want to help out. i know that someone dies every 3.4 seconds of hunger. 75% of those are under the age of five. it kills me to think that i am sitting here at home with a pantry full of food and they are dieing because they dont have enough, so does anyone know of any origanizations i can help with or places where i can buy something to help out, or if i raise nonperishable food items, how can i get them to africa to feed them??? Please give me any information you have on this topic. thanks
Well: according to"Stamp out Hunger it's an special program
that a post office suggested as of asking for canned items
but you must buy Groceries and only donate certain non parishable foods into box then put it where your neghtborhood
Mailman can see it when he picks up & delivers new letters
basicly best idea at Morning or Afternoon hours& yes help
Global Church Missionaries greatest Organization "
Will nanoparticles one day end world hunger, by crafting food, without the need of a farm, or ranch?
Will it render the argument against overpopulation obsolete?
Nanoparticles = nanotechnology
Think carbon nanotubes.
I was just reading an article that used the term nanoparticle instead of nanotechnology. That's why I used the word. Try not to get too hung up on other meanings of the word.
no.
in fact nano particles are dangerous to the body of any life form.
the end of the world Why was it wrong for the U.S to use the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagaski to end World War 2?
ok, so im having a debate with this one kid in my history class on monday and i want to be prepared. i basically have to know why was it wrong for us americans to drop the bombs on japan. im against the bombing so i need information from my side. you guys can also give me an idea of what my opponent might say so i can give a counterargument.
i also have to write an essay and my teacher gave us absolutely no information or sources for research. i would love it if u can give me cites on this subjest. PLEASE AND THANK YOU!!
This is, I suppose, a good subject for a debate, as there are many arguments which can be rallied on either side. I can help you out with a few.
One of the first reasons why it might have been arguably unethical was because we didn't at that time know exactly what the bomb would do. If you look at records of the time, it can be found that we knew some things about radiation's effects on people, but much of our current knowledge was developed over decades of study AFTER WW2. We knew it would explode like a very, very big bomb... and we also know it would do other things... just not exactly what.
The 'exactly what' is another good reason why the bombings might have been considered to be wrong. The reason why we stopped doing test explosions on the surface was because even explosions in Nevada caused MEASURABLE increases in stillbirths and birth defects in New York. One bomb is enough to spread radioactive fallout across hundreds and even thousands of miles. Thus, we put at risk almost everyone in that area of Asia, friend and foe alike.
More specificially, there is the Geneva Convention. Signed well before WW2, it prohibited certain kinds of weapons as completely inhumane, based on the kinds of damage they did. Among them are flame-throwers, phosporus explosives, and other things that cause burns and long-term painful wounds. Some of the survivors of the two nuclear bombings had patterns from their clothing BURNED into their skin (link 1). Many developed cancer and other long-term debilitating diseases. Almost all of them were civilians. Nuclear weapons, of course, didn't exist when the Geneva Convention was signed... but the kinds of damage they do are obviously against its spirit (there are those who maintain that it was an overt violation of other treaties). I could find you some descriptions of what it is like to die over weeks of radiation poisoning, but the descriptions are truly sickening. You are happier not hearing them.
Which raises another interesting point. We knew there were American citizens in Hiroshima. Some were attending school, and though there was no prisoner-of-war camp, there were undoubtedly many POWs there too. It is estimated we bombed more than two thousand of our own citizens (link 2). The government COULD have chosen a strictly military target, but they specifically wanted to maximize casualties for 'psychological effect' (link 3).
There are also a number of people who have argued that the bombings were not even militarily necessary. Many indicators suggest that Japan might have surrendered without EITHER a nuclear or a conventional attack. Dwight D Eisenhower, General MacArthur, and the United States Bombing Survey were ALL of this opinion. Which is an excellent counter to the idea that the bombings saved lives by preventing a conventional invasion!
All of which gives you a pretty good start. Hope that helps!
I know a way to end world hunger while studying !?
Please, help this amazing orgnaization at http://www.freerice.com when you need to study, they have all four sore subjects as well as languages. Simply go to this website and complete the quick activities and give a sponsored 20 grains of rice for each correct answer. I've already donated 3000!
I have donated over 30,000.
Keep getting the word around.
